RetroMC Punishment Manual
ℹ️ Notice: The RetroMC Punishment Manual (RPM) is currently in draft form and may be subject to revisions. Staff and community members are encouraged to provide feedback for its improvement.
The RetroMC Punishment Manual (RPM) is designed to outline the punishments issued to players for different offences.
This document is currently in draft and thus, only staff can edit this.
To staff: If you wish to edit this in any way, contact @cruxell (
CruxyMC in-game) or @derperu (
Orknarok_666).
Griefing
Griefing on the RetroMC server is considered violations of the community standards and will lead to disciplinary actions.
This is defined as the intentional and unauthorized removal/breaking and/or addition of any block(s) that are part of a build created by another player, without that player's explicit permission.
Exception: Players can modify builds in a village they own or with the approval of the village owner.
This exception allows village owners to manage and modify constructions within their village boundaries, assuming overall responsibility for the area's development and maintenance.
It is important to note that not all interactions with blocks are considered griefing; specifically, the breaking of random blocks placed by other players that do not form part of a structured build does not typically fall under the definition of griefing.
However, context and intent behind the actions are taken into consideration in each case; examples of actions that do not constitute griefing include the LMBD ban IDs bebfa and de69b.
This definition serves to protect the integrity of players' creations and ensure a respectful and constructive environment within the RetroMC community.
Appeals (draft by Orknarok_666)
A permanent ban that has been appealed will be reduced to 30 days from the acceptance date.
Advertising
Advertising can be broken up between malicious and non-malicious advertising, and thus, various cases should be handled differently. It should be noted that mentioning the names of other servers or other off-topic activities and discussing them is not necessarily a punishable offence; however, the issue lies in the direct advertising and distribution of other server IPs/links.
Malicious advertising
An example for what can be considered malicious advertising: https://bans.johnymuffin.com/b/e476cE
As you can see, this user is directly inviting people to an alternative server and asking them to play there, which is a direct conflict of interest for the server.
From the context given, this player seems to be at best unaware of how this could cause harm to the server, or at worst, just doesn't care and thus, was promptly banned.
Players like these can make appeals, but will have a permanent record on their ban history.
Non-malicious advertising
An example for what can be considered non-malicious advertising: https://bans.johnymuffin.com/b/465d4E
As you can see, this user had posted a link to another server in response to another player asking if there were any legacy anarchy servers.
While this user did post a domain name/IP address to another server (which is a conflict of interest and does harm the server), it is clear that it was not their intention to directly harm the server.
Players like these should promptly be met with a warn, a mute then a ban for this behavior if the offense is repeated.
AFKing/idling and alternate accounts
RetroMC has a feature wherein AFK players will be auto-kicked if they're idling for longer than 30 minutes; however, this feature can be bypassed via anti-AFK pools and other various methods.
For a while now, players haven't really been punished for bypassing the autokick timer, and there has never been an issue with people using anti-AFK pools.
However, around 11th January 2024, some players were using one or multiple accounts to merely idle while not being at the computer playing the game for long stretches of time – this resulted in players who are not being particularly active having immense gain for very little work, all while bypassing an intended auto-kick feature.
This was against the best interest of the server - due to the entity count being in the thousands at a time, it lagged the server by bringing the TPS down to the single-digits, as was the case with the players who did this originally.
This would have resulted in punishments on a case by case violation; however, this is no longer an issue, due to an automatic task that limits entity counts from mob spawners.
Autoclickers, kill aura, or any other external cheating method is still forbidden.
Legacy Infractions
Infractions which have taken place more than one year in the past are dealt with differently than under normal circumstances, and thus, the following will outline the proper procedures for dealing with these circumstances:
- Griefing: When a grief is found which has taken place more than a year in the past, the staff member is not required to issue a ban unless they judge that the grief is of significant severity that they feel it is necessary or worthwhile for record keeping. The seniority and prominence of the player should also be considered when issuing punishments in these cases. The grief should always be rolled back if possible.
Language (Draft)
Any Language in main Server Chat that isn't in English is not allowed, however this is not applied to /msg or /mail. Staff are not obligated to moderate chat in a language they don't understand and can at any moment enforce this rule.
Disrespect (Draft)
Punishments issued due to violation of the "Be respectful" rule vary depending on severity of the infraction.
Any form of bigotry/racism is always a permanent ban if the user who posted the content containing it was on any of RetroMC's platforms (in-game, Discord, wiki, etc.).
If the content is in a user's profile (Discord), then the user is warned and they have a set time limit to remove it, lest they get banned.
Players who actively harass others, express rudeness, trap them, or otherwise ruin other players' experience on RMC on the aforementioned platforms get a warning, then a mute if repeated (if applicable) or temporary ban and then a permanent ban if the offender still doesn't comply.
Village ownership rules (Draft)
Village owners have certain privileges over what they can do in villages they own.
Allowed actions:
- Requesting to move unfinished builds &/or bases of inactive players via WorldEdit.
- Requesting permission to demolish a build of a player in their town that they don't see fit (Mayors have the right to decide what gets to stay and what dosen't in there town as long as they have express permission).
- The actions in question must follow RSPM § 12.
- Making/modifying paths, moving torches/lamps, etc. and minor decoration modifications.
- Be promoted to village owner upon request if the current village owner is inactive.
- Village owners to-be must demonstrate an intent to maintain the village(s) they request to own, alongside activity in said village(s).
Forbidden actions:
- Any form of disrespect as listed in the above draft.
- This includes griefing/ruining other members' builds (Without Express Permission).
- Spamming village invites to players who don't want them.
Changelog
All changes to the RPM are to be documented accordingly.
| Date (DD/MM/YY) | Change | Author |
|---|---|---|
| 21/12/23 | Inception of RPM | |
| 21/12/23 | Added Proposed Policy For advertising. | |
| 21/12/23 | Minor formatting fixes. | |
| 6/1/24 | Added Proposed Policy For Alt-accounts (afk). | |
| 17/1/24 | Formatting fixes. | |
| 17/1/24 | Approval of Advertising rules & Temporary Approval of afk-pool rules by ork. | |
| 18/1/24 | Edited Punishments on Afk-pools | |
| 19/1/24 | More formatting fixes. | |
| 10/2/24 | Add Griefing (RetroMC Definition) section to the RPM. | |
| 10/2/24 | More formatting fixes + rewording. | |
| 17/2/24 | Legacy infraction section added to the RPM. | |
| 17/2/24 | Implemented Template:User-bust. | |
| 17/2/24 | Proposed Draft for appeals and Language Moderation by ork added by Cruxy. | |
| 19/2/24 | Added draft for disrespect-related infractions. | |
| 25/2/24 | Added draft for village owner privileges. | |
| 3/3/24 | Rendered the anti-AFK-at-farm-rule mostly moot (thanks to a Project Poseidon commit. |
