Monika V. Arbiter: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (fixed a glaring mistake >_<) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Lore]] | [[Category:Lore]] | ||
"Monika V. Arbiter" is a court case that occurred on April 19 2025. Monika ({{user|Shampooboots}}) sued Arbiter ({{user-nonwiki|ArbiterGaming}}) for not giving her CatTown after Arbiter lost a race. Arbiter's lawyer was {{user|crazyfish292929}} while {{user-nonwiki|3depressed}} was Monika's before he died | "Monika V. Arbiter" is a court case that occurred on April 19 2025. Monika ({{user|Shampooboots}}) sued Arbiter ({{user-nonwiki|ArbiterGaming}}) for not giving her CatTown after Arbiter lost a race. Arbiter's lawyer was {{user|crazyfish292929}} while {{user-nonwiki|3depressed}} was Monika's before he "died" unexpectantly. The judge was {{user-nonwiki|OustInsurrection}} and the juries were {{user|HanSolo20}}, {{user-nonwiki|FruitSandwich}} and {{user-nonwiki|Tadiq}}, but FruitSandwich was ejected due to accepting bribes from both parties. The case ended with no winner, Monika and Arbiter agreeing on Arbiter paying Monika 600$, and Aribiter agreeing that he wouldn't make anymore false promises. | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
Revision as of 12:43, 23 April 2025
"Monika V. Arbiter" is a court case that occurred on April 19 2025. Monika (
Shampooboots) sued Arbiter (
ArbiterGaming) for not giving her CatTown after Arbiter lost a race. Arbiter's lawyer was
crazyfish292929 while
3depressed was Monika's before he "died" unexpectantly. The judge was
OustInsurrection and the juries were
HanSolo20,
FruitSandwich and
Tadiq, but FruitSandwich was ejected due to accepting bribes from both parties. The case ended with no winner, Monika and Arbiter agreeing on Arbiter paying Monika 600$, and Aribiter agreeing that he wouldn't make anymore false promises.
A snapshot before the court began.