Monika V. Arbiter: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Lore]] | [[Category:Lore]] | ||
"Monika V. Arbiter" was a court case that occurred on April 19 2025. Monika ({{user|Shampooboots}}) sued Arbiter ({{user-nonwiki|ArbiterGaming}}) for not giving her CatTown after Arbiter lost a race. Arbiter's lawyer was {{user|crazyfish292929}} while {{user-nonwiki|3depressed}} was Monika's before he "died" unexpectedly. The judge was {{user-nonwiki|OustInsurrection}} and the juries were {{user|HanSolo20}}, {{user-nonwiki|FruitSandwich}} and {{user-nonwiki|Tadiq}}, but FruitSandwich was ejected due to accepting bribes from both parties. The case ended with no winner, however both parties agreed on Arbiter paying Monika a compensation of 600$, and Arbiter agreed that he wouldn't make any more false promises. | |||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
Latest revision as of 13:47, 25 April 2025
"Monika V. Arbiter" was a court case that occurred on April 19 2025. Monika (
Shampooboots) sued Arbiter (
ArbiterGaming) for not giving her CatTown after Arbiter lost a race. Arbiter's lawyer was
crazyfish292929 while
3depressed was Monika's before he "died" unexpectedly. The judge was
OustInsurrection and the juries were
HanSolo20,
FruitSandwich and
Tadiq, but FruitSandwich was ejected due to accepting bribes from both parties. The case ended with no winner, however both parties agreed on Arbiter paying Monika a compensation of 600$, and Arbiter agreed that he wouldn't make any more false promises.
A snapshot before the court began.