Monika V. Arbiter: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The "Monika V. Arbiter" is a court case that occurred on April 19 2025. Monika (shampooboots) sued Arbiter (ArbiterGaming) for not giving her | The "Monika V. Arbiter" is a court case that occurred on April 19 2025. Monika ({{user-nonwiki|shampooboots}}) sued Arbiter ({{user-nonwiki|ArbiterGaming) for not giving her CatTown after Arbiter lost a race. Arbiter's lawyer was {{user-nonwiki|crazyfish292929}} while 3depressed was Monika's before he died expectantly. The judge was {{user-nonwiki|OustInsurrection}} and the juries were {{user-nonwiki|HanSolo20}}, {{user-nonwiki|FruitSandwich}} and {{user-nonwiki|Tadiq}}, but FruitSandwich was ejected due to accepting bribes from both parties. The case ended with no winner, Monika and Arbiter agreeing on Arbiter paying Monika 500$, and Aribiter promising he wouldn't make anymore false claims. | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
Revision as of 16:23, 19 April 2025
The "Monika V. Arbiter" is a court case that occurred on April 19 2025. Monika (
shampooboots) sued Arbiter ({{user-nonwiki|ArbiterGaming) for not giving her CatTown after Arbiter lost a race. Arbiter's lawyer was
crazyfish292929 while 3depressed was Monika's before he died expectantly. The judge was
OustInsurrection and the juries were
HanSolo20,
FruitSandwich and
Tadiq, but FruitSandwich was ejected due to accepting bribes from both parties. The case ended with no winner, Monika and Arbiter agreeing on Arbiter paying Monika 500$, and Aribiter promising he wouldn't make anymore false claims.
A snapshot before the court began.